[ad_1]
Within the 12 months of 2003 a analysis was performed in Bangladesh beneath the supervision of Bircham Worldwide College on a topic regarding the adjustment of loss of life (of oneself) as a pure truth for each wholesome particular person. As through the time of analysis no such comparable earlier research had been out there on the subject, some self-arranged scoring system needed to be established with the intention to measure some essential standards like adjustment with the phenomenon of loss of life.
Amongst all of the researches on the acceptance of loss of life for the dying or terminally sick particular person, the Kubler-Ross’s analysis is essentially the most vital. It yielded a staging of the acceptance of the reality for the dying. The phases had been 1) denial, 2) anger, 3) bargaining, 4) melancholy, and 5) acceptance. For the aim of the comfort of the analysis, in Bangladesh, the phases had been reviewed in a reverse method. Thus the phases, within the reverse method, turned to the phases or ranges of rejecting loss of life. It was clearly evident from the Kubler-Ross analysis that the sooner phases, described by her, had been much less mature and the later phases had been extra mature when it comes to adjustment with loss of life. So within the sense of ordinal scoring with the reverse sequence of the phases of Kubler-Ross, it was assumed that acceptance stage ought to get the least rating from the view level of rejecting loss of life. Thus melancholy, bargaining, anger and denial phases ought to get the scores in a steadily growing method. Because it was a qualitative measurement method, scoring by ordinal method was essentially the most possible possibility too. However one factor that was stored in thoughts that accepting loss of life absolutely (100%) shouldn’t be accounted as a standard occasion as a result of it’s the highest kind of stress in all of the psychiatric and psychological stress scales. So lastly the title for the rating towards the phases was chosen because the “Demise Rejection Rating” (DRS) that stood as follows:
Demise Rejection Scores (DRS)
Stage………………………………………………………………………………………Rating
Acceptance————————————————————————–01
Despair————————————————————————–02
Bargaining ————————————————————————–03
Anger———————————————————————————04
Denial——————————————————————————–05
This scoring was efficiently used for the process of the analysis. The outcomes had been tabulated and statistical calculation yielded vital inference. Lastly when the analysis was submitted to the educational board of the college, it was accepted and likewise graded as an ‘Wonderful’ one. It’s price mentioning that the staging of Kubler-Ross was meant for the dying, however the DRS was meant for anyone who is aware of that she or he will die sometime however doesn’t know the way or when.
[ad_2]
Source by Mohammad Samir Hossain
